தலைப்பில் 2067ஐ 2077 ஆக மாற்றி விட்டேன். 2067க்கள் தமிழ் நாடு முன்னேறும் என்ற நம்பிக்கை தளர்ந்து விட்டதால். அடுத்த இதழில் என் கருத்துக்களை பதிவு செய்கிறேன்.
I-T probe unearths payment of bribes to TN Minister, officials' for gutkha sale
The Income-Tax Department is awaiting a response to a letter written to the Tamil Nadu government seeking further investigation into suspected bribes of almost ₹40 crore paid to a Minister and top officials.
The letter, written on August 11, 2016 by the investigation wing of the I-T Department, followed a search on the premises of a leading gutkha manufacturer in Chennai. A ledger seized during the raid lists alleged payouts to senior bureaucrats and police officers apart from the Minister.
Documents available with The Hindu suggest that Madhava Rao, one of the main partners of the gutkha manufacturer that sells the MDM brand, corroborated the payment of money to them. This was allegedly done over a period of one year as a quid pro quo for facilitating the sale of banned gutkha in Chennai.
In the letter sent to the Chief Secretary and the Director General of Police, a copy of which is available with The Hindu, the Principal Director of Income Tax (Investigation) B.R. Balakrishnan states that the ledger containing payouts was seized from the residence of a woman accountant of the firm.
The Income-Tax Department has so far not made any enquiries with the alleged recipients of the money. Attached with the letter were the relevant extracts from the statement of accounts, which suggest that voucher payments were made to senior officials of the Chennai police, Chennai Corporation, Health Department, Food Safety Department and Central Excise among others.
In a statement recorded before Kannan Narayanan, Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Mr. Rao is stated as referring to the payouts as “incidental expenses incurred by us as we are running the business of manufacturing and sale of gutkha which is not legally permitted in Tamil Nadu.”
Mr. Rao is stated as having explained the coded references in the ledger. For example, GE (Delhi/CE/Rao) is said to have meant “General Expenses, Central Excise officer”. The amounts paid were listed under different heads — as monthly expenses, Deepavali bonus and Christmas bonus.
After receiving the letter, the then Director-General of Police had sent a report to the Chief Minister, according to sources in the police headquarters. The documents are still pending with the government for action. However, a couple of months ago, on the basis of another letter written by the then Commissioner of Police, the Tamil Nadu government did refer the issue of illegal sale of gutkha and the possible connivance of police officers in abetting this for an investigation by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC).
Income-Tax Department officials suspect this was done to ward off criticism that no action was being taken in the gutkha matter. Significantly, the DVAC has made little progress in the case.